IPSI completes 1st International Playground Maintenance Technician Course in Chai Wan Hong Kong China

January 15th, 2013

34 enthusiastic Hong Kong course participants eager to learn

Class Photo of all 34 PMT Course Participants - Instructors - and Playright Staff holding up sign

The first playground maintenance technician training program was offered in Hong Kong January 7th and 8th. Playright Children’s Play Association hosted the first ever playground maintenance technician training half way around the world. The program, Maintaining Child’s Play, was developed by the Park District Risk management Agency of Illinois for its membership. Clemson University is offering this training program for training front line play area maintenance staff responsible for the day to day facility inspections, routine maintenance, minor repairs, and custodial related tasks.

Thirty-four (34) enthusiastic participants attended the two day course. They represented government agencies, not-for-profits, private property management firms’, clubhouse management firms, higher education institutions, and play equipment suppliers.

The participants learned about all the various common types of materials they would encounter within a public play environment. While some of the materials discussed may not be on every playground, these materials would be likely be encountered somewhere within the public common areas somewhere within their jurisdiction. Each participant received the course manuscript, Maintaining Child’s Play: A Comprehensive Guide for Maintaining Safe Playgrounds, a reference resource to help them react to situations they might encounter throughout the life of a public play environment. The Course Participant Guide. This book was authored by Monty Christiansen, Steve Plumb, and Steve Kleinman and published by the Park District Risk management Agency in 2010-2011. They also received a copy of Playground Maintenance: A Comprehensive Guide for Maintaining Safe Playgrounds, Participant Guide, Clemson Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management. The two day training followed the various chapter of the manuscript highlighting various components of the manuscript through an interactive multi-media presentation. The hands on skills building exercises and virtual playground video segments were highly most important to all participants.

Playright staff received positive input from the participants throughout the training and told IPSI they were pleased with the outcome. Playright Executive Director, Kathy Wong, stated that it is at time difficult to know prior to any training whether the content and presentation will meet the needs of the local market. Organizing a training program half way around the world using emails as the only means of communication presents challenges but the long relationship between Playright and IPSI has provided a solid collaborative relationship for the exchange and delivery of the most current trends and issues effecting public play area management. The ultimate decision as to what information, guidelines or international standards should be followed will always be a local choice. IPSI’s mission is to provide current timely information from around the world that will enhance children’s play experience while minimizing known hazards within the play environment, and improve public access to all play environments. Our efforts continue to assist the play area industry better understand these issues and empower them to take a proactive approach to the management challenges all owners/operators will experience throughout the life of the play area to assure the safety of the user, function of both the play equipment and the impact attenuating surfacing, while addressing the attractiveness and cleanliness of the entire environment.

IPSI Executive Director, Ken Kutska, would like to thank Playright Executive Director, Kathy Wong and her entire staff. I would especially like to thank Chris Yuen, Ada Wong, and Aby Chau for all their hard work to make the course a success. Many organizations help to sponsor this course but Sabrina Lee, CEO and Francis Li, VP of Business Development of Park Supplies Company Limited provide the course instructors Ken Kutska and Tom Kalousek, with the most gracious Chinese Hospitality Hong Kong has to offer. Also a special thanks to Partick Lee, CT-Art Creation Pte. Ltd. of Singapore for personal guide service throughout our trip.

Playground Maintenance and Inspection Training Program now available or Playground Maintenance Technicians

November 2nd, 2012

PLAYGROUND MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTIONS
By Kenneth S Kutska, CPSI
September 15, 2012

Training the front-line staff responsible for day to day operation of our public play spaces is vital to the success of a comprehensive program of playground safety. Too many children are injured on our public playgrounds because of a lack of proper maintenance practices. This is not because of a lack of concern for the public’s safety as much as it is due to a lack of knowledge of training in proper processes necessary to meet equipment and surfacing manufacturer’s expectations for a safe and properly functioning piece of equipment or surfacing system. I am pleased to announce that Clemson University is now offering a two day training program to train playground maintenance technicians. This program was initially developed by Monty Christiansen, Professor Emeritus, Penn State University over a ten year period of research and observation of “Best Practices” throughout the play equipment industry. The Park District Risk Management Agency of Lisle, Illinois worked with Monty to put his vision for the program into practice. Clemson University is the managing partner in making this program available to any local host. For more information on the program or hosting a program contact Clemson University, Carly Summers at 864-656-2525

Playground maintenance and inspections go hand in hand. Inspections and their purpose should not be confused with that of a playground compliance audit. There is a distinct difference between these two processes. A compliance audit is based on a local or national standard comparing the condition of the equipment, surfacing and equipment layout against an accepted or mandated minimum standard of care. The playground audit is only the beginning of a comprehensive playground safety management plan as it only identifies deficiencies and ranks these in order of priority for corrective action. A routine safety inspection is done to identify all new hazards on existing playgrounds resulting from rapid or evolving changes, such as; vandalism, storm damage, general wear & tear, litter accumulation, or to identify and report a broken or missing playground component. A thorough inspection coupled with the application of proper routine and preventive maintenance practices should be considered as your standard operating procedure.

• The primary function of a good inspection and maintenance program is to ensure the safety of the people using the play environment. The safety of the users is the foundation for what the agency adopts as its standard of care.
• Inspections and timely maintenance preserve the utility or function of the equipment. We want to keep it working. We inspect for wear of swing hangers or lubricate moving parts to keep them functioning and to prolong the life of the equipment.
• We also inspect and perform routine maintenance to keep the area hygienically clean. Children and animals do make messes in play environments. Some of their messes may spread disease.
• We also inspect and perform maintenance to keep the area looking good. We want our play environments to be aesthetically clean and inviting.

By performing regular inspections we are being pro-active, eliminating issues before they become a problem. All too often maintenance is perceived as a “fix it” task. This “reactive” approach to maintenance with staff only responding when there is a problem does not efficiently utilize the agencies resources and does not ensure the safety of the user.

Inspections should be based on the standard of care established by the agency. The inspections should include the recommendations provided by the manufacturer of the playground equipment and become a part of the development of the inspection and maintenance checklists.

The inspection checklist should be tailored to what is provided at the playground. Don’t have a generic checklist that covers any piece of equipment and expect the inspector to skip those not present at the playground he or she is inspecting.

Inspections and maintenance should be performed based on frequency of use. If inspections are not easy to accomplish they won’t be performed. Inspection forms should be created that are tailored to the type of inspection and the area being inspected.

There are two types of inspections that are performed based on frequency of use. A low frequency inspection is typically a seasonal inspection, performed two or three times a year. This is an up-close, in-depth, top-to-bottom type of inspection done to evaluate the general wear and tear on the equipment. The low frequency inspections are tied directly to preventive maintenance.

A high frequency inspection may be performed daily or routinely. This type of inspection identifies rapidly changing conditions due to weather, vandalism, sudden breakage and identifies surfacing problems typically associated with loose fill materials. Typically while performing a high frequency inspection routine maintenance is done such as raking loose-fill materials back into place and picking up garbage. During high frequency inspections, such bad damage may be noted that repairs (remedial maintenance) will be required.

There is no magic formula to determine the frequency of inspection. However there are some common considerations. First consider how often is the playground used and by how many children at a time. What are the ages of the children that use the playground? Very young children are not as hard on equipment as adolescents. Consider the vandalism patterns throughout the playground area. If vandalism is a constant concern at a site then obviously that site will need to be inspected more frequently, possibly every day.

Development Factors such as the nature and type of equipment will influence the rate of inspection. Is it moving or static equipment? Swings or items that have moving components are going to need to be serviced more frequently than stationary components. If the surfacing under and around the equipment is a loose material, it will need to be maintained more frequently to insure that it remains in place under the equipment. The type of materials use in the manufacture of the equipment will also contribute to the determination of the use factor. Wood for example must be inspected more frequently than steel because of the very nature of wood. The age of the equipment is also a factor. An old house or car is always going to require a little more tender loving care and the same goes for an old playground.

Environmental influences will also be a determining factor in how often you perform inspections. The soil and drainage conditions will effect the wear of your surfacing materials. The geographic location and climate will influence how the product performs over time. Dramatic fluctuations in temperature can accelerate material deterioration. The combination of sand and wind can wear materials down very quickly. Atmospheric conditions such as acid rain and heavy pollution would require more frequent inspection.

The purpose of a low frequency inspection is to document routine wear and tear on equipment and to establish preventive maintenance schedules. During this type of inspection the inspector is looking for evidence of normal wear and tear. The equipment manufacturer’s recommendations for preventive maintenance should be performed at this time. This is the time that bearings are lubricated, swing hangers are checked for signs of wear, hardware is checked for loosening and the general condition of the equipment, surfacing and footings is evaluated.

The results of the inspection must be documented and actions taken to repair or remove hazards that are noted. The inspections can be used to anticipate future expenditures, so that these expenditures can be added to the annual budget. When a purchase order is issued there is a paper trail noting that a replacement part or work order has been ordered. It is important to follow up with documentation that the part was installed or that the work was performed.

When preventive maintenance is performed it is important to make sure that this documentation is present in the site history file. By performing preventive maintenance the agency is being pro-active and ultimately ensuring the safety of the users.

The site plan and composite structure details that were prepared during the first steps of the playground management process are used again during the low frequency inspections. Having access to copies of these site plans enable the inspector to note specifically on the plan what item of equipment needs repair or replacement. When a work order is issued, the person performing the repair will know exactly where the work is to be done.

The purpose of high frequency inspections is to insure that frequent, on going routine maintenance is being performed. During these inspections the staff should see if the general condition of the playground has changed due to wear & tear, vandalism or environment. These inspections are to be performed on a regular basis. Your agency must decide how frequent is frequent. In some situations they may need to be performed twice daily if necessary. The inspection should be performed by maintenance staff, playground supervisor, or other trained personnel. The results of the daily inspection are noted and documented. A system should be in place for review of these inspection forms regularly by a supervisor.

The purpose of routine maintenance is to take care of the custodial needs of the play environment. Trash and debris are removed, surfacing is maintained and the playground is briefly inspected for any sudden changes due to vandalism or weather. During these inspections work orders for remedial maintenance may be submitted when necessary.

The importance of timely maintenance can never be underestimated. According to one study of injuries that resulted in litigation, one out of every three cases alleged that lack of maintenance was the cause of the injury. Imagine how much safer America’s playgrounds would be if we just did two simple things.
• Made sure that all playground equipment had the appropriate surfacing materials and depth under and around it.
• Performed regular maintenance on the playground equipment and environment.

The responsibility for maintenance is a shared responsibility. According to the ASTM Standard, the manufacturer is required to provide the owner/operator with “clear and concise instructions and procedures for the installation of each play structure designed or provided, as well as a complete parts list.” They are also required to provide “inspection, maintenance, and repair instructions, including, but not limited to, what, when, and how to inspect, maintain, and repair” Check that appropriate signs indicating intended user age group and supervision is recommended must be properly displayed and legible. The sign or label must warn the public of hazards associated with entanglements such as items worn around a child’s neck or wearing a bicycle helmet while playing on the equipment. Also warnings for hot surfaces are required when the equipment or impact attenuating surface systems may reach temperatures that can cause serious burns to some of our youngest children. These warnings need to be worded and placed at locations which give the users time to adjust or adapt to the possible concern before they actually come in contact with the potential concern.

The owner operator is obligated to ensure that the equipment is installed according to the manufacturer recommendations. They are also bound to maintain the surfacing with in the use zone of each play structure in accordance with the requirements of ASTM1292. The owner/operator is also charged with keeping accurate records of inspection, maintenance, and repair. Only with timely inspections and proactive corrective action can the playground be maintained free of potential deficiencies that may result in a serious injury to a child.

To summarize, a comprehensive plan begins with establishing a philosophy or plan. A person responsible for day to day operation of a public playground area you must be trained in basic inspection and maintenance procedures your agency has established to assure the safety of the public and preserve the function and longevity of the equipment and surfacing. A site history file must be established for every playground area. The playground compliance audit is the first step taken to determine the present condition everything within the playground environment. The audit must be analyzed and immediate hazards must be dealt with on a priority basis but regardless of what the audit identifies regular routine inspections and proactive corrective action must take place to maintain and improve upon the current conditions so nothing deteriorates to a point to increase the probability a serious accident may occur. To mitigate the potential for injury the owner must establish a plan for removing, repairing and retrofitting the existing equipment. Most importantly, all of your actions must be documented.

By instituting a comprehensive program of playground maintenance you will discover that the “Benefits are Endless”.

There is a quote used at the end of the NRPA’s Certified Playground Safety Inspector Course that states….

Not all playground accidents “just happen”.

They may occur because those — who, by proper actions, could have minimized the opportunities & removed the conditions for accidents — failed in this responsibility to the children.

Don’t let this be said about you.

Ken Kutska, IPSI Executive Director, presents new playground maintenance course in Portland Oregon November 5-6 2012

August 15th, 2012

IPSI, LLC will be presenting this new two day training program for playground maintenance and routine inspection technicians. This program is designed for field technicians who are responsible for the day to day operation and maintenance of their public play spaces. The program was developed by the Park District Risk Management Agency (PDRMA.org) of Illinois for its members. The program content is bases on a new text created from research conducted by Monty Christiansen, Professor Emeritus, Penn State University. It is now being offered to all organizations outside of Illinois by Clemson University through an agreement between Clemson University and PDRMA. Interested parties should contact the Oregon Recreation and Park Association for details

IPSI completes first CPSI training in Putrajaya Malaysia

June 11th, 2012

Singapore CUGE HortPark CPSI Course lecture

First of two day CPSI Course lecture to CPSI Candidates in Singapore

CPSI candidates make initial visit local neighborhood play area to record assessment of the environment.

Malaysia CPSI Course first day site visit for initial risk assessment of area

Test Panel Performance Requirements Demonstration

CPSI candidates work in small groups on risk assessment exercise

Ken Kutska and Patick Lee of CT Art Creations Singapore assist participants in risk assessment exercise


During the first week in May 2012, IPSI Executive Director Ken Kutska completed the first ever CPSI training in Putrajaya Malaysia. After almost two years of communications and planning with Landscape and Parks Division authorities in Malaysia the Certified Playground Safety Inspector Course and Exam was held in the government center of Malaysia. Putrajaya is a beautiful setting located many miles outside of the urban city center of Kuala Lumpur. The program was offered over a three days and the exam was administered the fourth day. The program was well received and the government authorities now realize what lies ahead of them as they work to bring their children’s play spaces into compliance with international standards. IPSI conducted the CPSI Course and Exam in Malaysia after conducting another CPSI Course and Exam for CUGE and the Singapore National Parks Board. IPSI also presented the CPSI Course Executive Summary and an overview of the US accessibility standards for public play spaces during a two day seminar of current trends in the public playground industry. IPSI continues to work with countries throughout the Asian Region who look to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) industry standards as a guide in developing or refining their own best practices.

Their biggest challenge comes from the extreme environmental forces the face day in and day out. Extreme heat and humidity plus close proximity to the coast common throughout the region pose the biggest challenge to owner/operators of these public spaces. What we know is that UV and thermal radiation coupled with the salt air and common atmospheric pollution accelerate corrosion of every material used in the manufacturer of public play equipment. How these spaces are maintained throughout the life of the playground will dictate how long the space will provide the fun and enjoyment it was built to deliver. What we do know from current observations is the equipment in place today will not last as long as it might in other more temperate regions of the world. Material selection for future playground equipment and impact attenuating surfaces will become an important consideration and challenge as they move forward. Most important to the longevity of the play environment will be their ability to improve on the current maintenance and repair practices. This is not unique to this region. It is a worldwide problem. What is unique to this region is the compounding negative effects on the play environment and the rapid deterioration of almost all materials used in outdoor play environments due to the above mentioned environmental factors.

Kutska comments on U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission’s 2-16 -2012 Release #12-109 Children’s Slides Recalled by Landscape Structures due to Fall Hazard

February 18th, 2012

2-16-12 RECALL NEWS from CPSC on LSI Glide
The February 16th U.S. CPSC recall on the LSI Slalom Glider is an interesting development and it is worth another look. How many children need to sustain an injury allegedly due to some product before it is determined to be unsafe? What type and how many injuries must be sustained to warrant a government recall? At what point should government intervene to protect us from ourselves? Who determines when something is unsafe? The CPSC has made a decision to require a manufacturer to voluntarily recall one of its products. While we can applaud any action in response to a known hazard but I cannot help but wonder what was their basis for this decision? If 14 reported injuries (fractures), one bruised spleen, and one fractured collar bone over five years on thousands of these types of climbers are enough to require removal when will we hear about a recall on bicycles, soccer balls, skateboards, roller skates, and just about everything else we can think of that results in thousands of cuts and scrapes, numerous broken bones and yes, even death. The children who were reported injured on this equipment were under the age of eight. What has our judicial system determined to be the age of reason; a child older than 7? Obviously these children were probably not experienced in using such a piece of play equipment. They were also probably lacking in physical development, balance, maybe even slightly overweight or lacking in cognitive development. This recall labeled the play component as not compliant with the slide requirements of the CPSC Public Playground Safety Handbook. They are correct in their analysis for all the reasons stated in the recall however the component was not designed or labeled as a slide. It is a GLIDE. I understand that if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck then it must be a duck. I can see for myself that children can slide down the component or climb up it just like other compliant slide. Just because someone names something does not mean that is how children will use it during play. Does anyone remember the banister slides we have seen on some public playgrounds? Manufacturers even labeled these incline double or triple rails as a type of slide. The user would have to straddle the bars with their legs or arms to go up or down the event safely. I am sure there were children that probably fell through the bars to the surface and I am sure some even broke a bone or two. I am sure some even used this equipment in unintended ways but that is just being a kid playing and experimenting with their own bodies. Do you think children have gone down these on their skateboard? Where am I going with all this? I am not exactly sure but one thing for certain is that until we as a society can accept the results of our own actions and take responsibility for our lack of supervision and most importantly accept broken bones as a part of growing up we will continue to see the loss of play experiences children so desperately need to develop to their full potential. I cannot help but ask myself where this all will end. Is there something to learn from this CPSC action? I think it is time to have a public discussion on Risk and Hazards. What is the definition of an Acceptable Risk? When does something become an Unacceptable Hazard? What level of injury are we trying to protect a child from? Is it all falls? Why not? We know falls are the number one cause of injuries to all people. In this instance we do not even know if the surface the children fell on was compliant to the impact attenuating surface requirements of the CPSC. Does anyone realize the ramifications of this recall? There are several other U.S. manufacturers and some international companies selling very similar play components to this Slalom Glider. While they look very similar and are used in the same way there are distinct differences not easily recognized by the general public. Some may not be as high off the surface. They may be at a different slope. None of them have any side rails and none of them are called slides or even glider.
So what is next? How much litigation might take place as a result of this recall? When is there enough information available to the general public and its government regulatory authority to make some unilateral decision that will have severe financial impact on any industry? I come back to the question of when does something warrant the label, hazard or unsafe? How does something get recalled when such a small number of children have suffered a less than permanently debilitating injury or death? There may be more information related to the decision but I have not seen it. I would like to see it. More importantly I would like to know when we will have an adult discussion on the value of and need for challenging play in children’s development? This discussion is desperately needed so we might agree on some defensible criteria for risk assessment based on the type and severity of injury we can all work towards eliminating. Equally important is the need to agree on what types of injuries we can accept while we attempt to provide physically challenging environments for our children? I fear for children’s free play opportunities based on this governmental course of action. It always seems that avoidance of potential losses through public playground owners elimination of the potential cause is becoming more and more their first course of action. It is easy to implement. That being said I fear for what might become the next playground equipment recall? What play event will be next to be eliminated, the swing set? Why not upper body equipment such as overhead ladder (horizontal ladder)? More broken bones occur on this component than any other piece of play equipment as a result of use by children with limited upper body strength, especially those less than 8 years of age. Why not? After all upper body strength isn’t important in today’s high tech world.
In my opinion, a more reasonable course of action might have been to label this equipment for children above some age greater than 5, 6 or even 7, but I would leave that decision to the designers and the child development community. SEE RECALL BELOW
NEWS from CPSC
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission
Office of Communications Washington, D.C.
________________________________________

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEFebruary 16, 2012
Release #12-109 Firm’s Recall Hotline: (888) 438-6574
CPSC Recall Hotline: (800) 638-2772
CPSC Media Contact: (301) 504-7908
Children’s Slides Recalled by Landscape Structures due to Fall HazardWASHINGTON, D.C. – The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with the firm named below, today announced a voluntary recall of the following consumer product. Consumers should stop using recalled products immediately unless otherwise instructed. It is illegal to resell or attempt to resell a recalled consumer product.
Name of Product: Slalom Glider
Units: About 900Manufacturer: Landscape Structures Inc., of Delano, Minn.

Hazard: The Slalom Glider is a playground slide that lacks a transition platform on the top and sides of the chute. Children can fall when moving from the ladder to the slide and when descending the chute.
Incidents/Injuries: CPSC and the firm have received 16 reports of injuries to children under 8-years old, including one bruised arm, 14 fractures to arms and legs, one fractured collar bone and one bruised spleen.
Description: The Slalom Glider is a distinctive 6-foot high playground slide that is curved in shape and made from molded plastic. It includes an arched, tubular steel access ladder. The recalled product comes as a stand-alone slide or as an attachment to other playground equipment. The recalled products have model numbers 156456 and 172627 and were sold in combinations of colors, including red, blue, tan, green, granite and white.
Sold: To schools and other facilities with playground equipment nationwide between January 2006 and December 2011 for about $2300.
Manufactured in: United StatesRemedy: Consumers should immediately stop children from using the recalled gliders and owners will be contacted by Landscape Structures regarding removal instructions. Customers will be given the option of replacing the Slalom Glider with another piece of playground equipment, receiving a refund, or receiving credit towards a future purchase.
Consumer Contact: For additional information, contact Landscape Structures toll-free at (888) 438-6574 Monday through Friday between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. CT, or visit the firm’s website at www.playlsi.comThe U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is still interested in receiving incident or injury reports that are either directly related to this product recall or involve a different hazard with the same product. Please tell us about your experience with the product on www.saferproducts.gov
CPSC is charged with protecting the public from unreasonable risks of injury or death associated with the use of the thousands of consumer products under the agency’s jurisdiction. Deaths, injuries, and property damage from consumer product incidents cost the nation more than $900 billion annually. CPSC is committed to protecting consumers and families from products that pose a fire, electrical, chemical, or mechanical hazard. CPSC’s work to ensure the safety of consumer products – such as toys, cribs, power tools, cigarette lighters, and household chemicals – contributed to a decline in the rate of deaths and injuries associated with consumer products over the past 30 years.
Under federal law, it is illegal to attempt to sell or resell this or any other recalled product.
To report a dangerous product or a product-related injury, go online to: www.saferproducts.gov, call CPSC’s Hotline at (800) 638-2772 or teletypewriter at (800) 638-8270 for the hearing impaired. Consumers can obtain this news release and product safety information at www.cpsc.gov. To join a free e-mail subscription list, please go to https://www.cpsc.gov/cpsclist.aspx.