Posts Tagged ‘ASTM’

New ASTM F1487-11 Standard released November 2011

Saturday, January 7th, 2012

New ASTM F1487-11 Standard released November 2011
By Kenneth S Kutska, CPSI
Executive Director, International Playground Safety Institute, LLC
Chair of ASTM F15.29 Subcommittee responsible for the ASTM F1487 Standard
November 18, 2011

As Chair of the American Society for Testing and Materials Subcommittee responsible for ASTM F1487 Standard for performance requirements for public playground equipment I am pleased to announce the latest revision of this standard. This revision is over four years in the making and there are several significant additions. You can order this standard online through the ASTM web site (www.astm.org). I might suggest you look into the cost of joining the ASTM and compare the cost of membership to the cost of purchasing this one standard. As a member of the ASTM you are entitled to one volume of the ASTM standards in either a paper or CD version at no charge. The playground standards are located in one of two volumes. The standard would be in either F15.07 or F15.11. Check with ASTM membership services or do a ASTM web site search for ASTM F1487-11 Standard or any other playground related standards to determine which volume is most important to address your needs.

Major Swings Section Revisions

There is a new definition for a swing that should be of particular interest to all of us. A swing is now defined as an element or seat suspended from an elevated support structure, allowing users to move freely in one or more planes, possessing a pivot point greater than 24 in. (610 mm) when measured vertically from the top of the suspended element to the pivot point. This clarifies when a suspended element should comply with all the other performance requirements of swings based on a hazard based analysis. When we think of swings, we envision traditional to-fro belt or bench type swings or a tire swing. We have seen many new products from around the world attempt to enter the market place. While they may be compliant to another international standard, they did not meet the ASTM Standard. Now however, there is some hope. Up until now, we could not clearly and totally evaluate these new swinging products by using the ASTM F1487 Standard. The ASTM F15.29 Subcommittee Working Group responsible for swings took an in-depth look at what the real hazards were regarding swinging components. The new performance requirements are based upon the analysis of injury data related to swinging components. They concluded that swing related hazards were attributable to; falls to the surface, impact with stationary structural components, and impact with the suspended swinging components. Our goal is to eliminate known hazards with the understanding we cannot control how the users may attempt to interact with the play equipment in unintended ways. The Standard now identifies three possible types of swing configurations. They are; single axis (to-fro), multiple axis (rotating), or swings with multiple motions consisting of a combination of single axis and multiple axis (combination swings). Fall related injuries are already addressed in the F1487 Standard by requiring compliance to the ASTM F1292 Standard from the highest pivot point. The next major impact type injury regardless the swing type is from suspended components impacting the user. The new standard addresses this impact hazard through a new “Dynamic Impact Test” procedure that measures impact forces created by the swinging component. This test is intended to be administered by a commercial laboratory. The application of existing clearance zones requirements to any suspended swinging component reduces the likelihood of impact injuries sustained when the user and swinging component comes in contact with the structural members or the adjacent to-fro swing. More on this test method later.

Another concern was the CPSC’s recommendation that multiple occupancy swings not be used on public playgrounds. This recommendation has been around for more than 20 years. There were legitimate concerns based on the injury data gathered over the years but times have changed and the marketplace has introduced many new products. Some argue for multi-occupancy swing seats based on new products introduced in other countries. There does not appear to be any recorded impact injury history from these new products. The dilemma is that the ASTM Standard and the CPSC Handbook allow for multi-axis swings such, as tire swings, and not a multi-occupancy to-fro swing? These multi-occupancy multi-axis swing components (tire swing) move in all directions unlike the predictable to-fro action of traditional single occupancy to-fro swings. Why one and not the other? The explanation might be the fact the swinging component was a tire and somewhat flexible and impact attenuating. The CPSC Handbook even limited the swinging component weight to 35 pounds. This happened to be the average weight of an automobile tire. The real hazard and injury in question is Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) through impact to the child’s head or body. But what really causes the injury and at what point does Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) occur? During the October 2011 ASTM F8.63 Subcommittee meeting in Tampa Florida, Rolf Huber, Canadian Playground Advisory Group reported the results of a ten year injury analysis conducted by the NHTSA. The study showed a 10% reduction in TBI and death after a implementing a reduction in automobile industry impact thresholds. This study demonstrates real injury reduction related to a measureable reduction in industry impact threshold used to design automobiles. This study supports our new threshold for the “Dynamic Impact Test” on swinging components and therefore addresses the impact injury to the head and for the most part other body parts. The primary cause of serious impact injuries has always been heavy solid swinging components such as; metal animal swings, bench swings, and the two person glider swings. By implementing the new “Dynamic Impact Test” for suspended swinging components, we can mitigate the impact hazard for any swing component. The logic of this recommendation was of major concern to our group. Head impact injuries resulting from falls to a hard surface should have been addressed through compliance with ASTM F1292 thresholds for impact attenuation of less than 200g and 1000 HIC. These thresholds were not intended to address fractures, but the risk of death from serious head injury. It was unknown at what impact threshold we can achieve a significant reduction in broken bones. Based on the new research related to Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) we are seeing significant reduction in TBI in automobile accidents. The new swing impact test thresholds more closely follow the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) automobile safety standards as related to our scope of intended users, especially the pre-school age group, and the results of studies of concussed NFL players during the late 1990s. The standard requires test compliance of all swing seats and swing components located less than 84 inches from the surface during its full range of motion. The test method requires the suspended elements be brought back to a point, 60 degrees from its position at rest, and released to strike an instrumented head form imparting a force less 100 g and 500 HIC.. Mr. Huber’s research of studies on the subject of TBI and bone fractures supports this conclusion for a significant reduction in these types of playground injuries when these new impact thresholds are not exceeded.

The same impact performance requirements for clearance and use zones apply to a traditional single user to-fro single-axis swing-set, with no more than two swings per bay, however multi-occupancy and multi-axis swings have some different performance requirements. Both multi-occupancy and multi-axis swings are limited to one swinging component per bay and have specific clearance requirements related to their designed path of travel. These requirements eliminate impact by adjacent swing elements and their structural components.

The combination swing is a new type of product being introduced around the world. It represents a combination of to-fro and multi-axis swings and is used by more than one person. Taking the same hazard based approach; the Working Group came up with some similar, yet quite different, performance requirements. The clearance and use zone requirements combine the side and overhead clearance zones and use zone requirements for each type of moving (swinging) component. These requirements are too difficult to address in this article without including many illustrations. I suggest that you acquire the new ASTM F1487-11 standard and study that section in detail.

Signs and Labels

The Subcommittee also dedicated a significant amount of time on signs and labels section of the standard based upon recent injury data and requirements for warnings found within the 2010 U. S. CPSC Public Playground Safety Handbook.

The Sign and Label Section of the new standard entails significant changes that should be read very carefully. The new standard states the owner/operator of the play equipment shall be responsible for the content and location of all signs. What does this mean? The information regarding the intended ages of the users shall be provided by the manufacturer, designer, or consultant. The final location of these signs and warnings shall be placed where the manufacturer, designer, or consultant states, however, for lack of any guidance on location for posting these signs, the owner/operator shall place them so they are readily visible to the intended viewer and alert the viewer to the potential hazard in time to take appropriate action. The message may be put on either a sign or a label and be located on the equipment or be freestanding. Freestanding signs must be located outside the use zone. The question for all of us is, “Where do we locate the warnings so the viewer has time to act prior to coming in contact with the hazard?” Currently there is no specific wording for many of the warnings now required. Information communicated on the sign or label, or both, shall address, but not be limited to, the following messages:
• Information message communicating age appropriateness as determined by the manufacturer/designer.
• Information message communicating, at a minimum, supervision recommendation.
• Warning message communicating the removal of helmets, drawstrings or accessories around the neck which are all known to create head entrapment or entanglement hazards.
• Warning message communicating hot play surfaces and/or ground level protective surfacing, when applicable. These surfaces are known to reach temperatures high enough to cause serious burns to children generally less than four years of age but because of the many variables effecting how and when a surface becomes a safety concern it was not possible to find a one size fits all approach that the subcommittee could agree upon.
• Warning message communicating the hazard of play equipment located over hard surfaces, when applicable. This warning message is no longer required to be plastered on each and every piece of free standing equipment.

Specification for all warning signs or labels, or both, should conform to ANSI Z535.1 and either ANSI Z535.2 or ANSI Z535.4 in the following areas: legibility, type of lettering, clarity of message and symbol, color specifications, and word message and visibility. The labels or signs should be durable and conform to UL 969. It has been and continues to be the responsibility of the owner/operator to replace signs or labels, or both, should they become illegible, destroyed, or removed.

The Subcommittee has agreed to continue to work on the Sign and Label Section to seek better solutions, if any can be found. Anybody who is interested in working on this subject may contact me; however membership in ASTM is a prerequisite to be on a Subcommittee’s Working Group. I can forward your suggestions to the appropriate Working Group.

Two New Reference Documents

The Standard has added two reference documents that must be followed by the manufacturer, designer, consultant, and owner/operator. Regardless of the material or the treatment process, the manufacturer/designer/fabricator shall ensure that the users of the playground equipment cannot ingest, inhale, or absorb any potentially hazardous amounts of substances through body surfaces as a result of contact with the equipment. All materials content shall comply with the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA). This Act pertains to, but is not limited to, coatings and substrate of the materials used within the play environment.

As with previous versions of this Standard, this specification does not address accessibility, except as it pertains to safety issues not covered in the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) 2010 Standard for Accessible Design: Title II (28 CFR 35) and Title III (28 CFR 36). This document is available free at: http://www.ada.gov/regs2010/ADAregs2010.htm. This document is now the law and will be enforceable early 2012. While this document gives us guidance for what constitutes the minimum requirements for accessible design it cannot guarantee we might not have to face a complaint raised by one or more of our constituents. Then and only then will the Department of Justice rule on what, if anything, may need to done to bring a public playground or any public facility into compliance.

In closing, I would like to encourage everyone to get a copy of this new document and read it carefully. That being said I have just three more changes to highlight from the 2007 version. First, for many years we have stated there should be no gaps at the transition of a slide and the slide surface should smooth and continuous. This has been open to unlimited translations by many inspectors. The manufacturers are very aware of the safety concern with entanglements on slides. To take some of this guesswork out of the application of this old requirement we have changed the wording to, “Slides shall be constructed in such a manner as to provide a continuous sliding surface (roller slides exempted) and shall minimize the likelihood of entanglements.” This leaves a lot of the compliance interpretation to the manufacturer/designer so long as the slide is installed and maintained as intended.

Second, we now have a performance test method to determine when a projection increasing in diameter from its initial surface is truly an entanglement hazard. When the projection fits within any of the protrusion test gauges and the increase in size extends greater than 0.12 in. (3.0 mm) from the initial surface with a depth greater than 0.12 in. (3.0 mm) it is an entanglement hazard.

Third, on stairways, all steps greater than 48 in. (1220 mm) above the protective surfacing shall be required to have protective barriers. The height of the protective barrier on a step shall be the vertical distance between the top front edge of a step and the top surface of the protective barrier and appropriate for the ages of the intended users.

Certified Playground Safety Inspectors: How do they add up?

Monday, August 22nd, 2011

Certified Playground Safety Inspectors: How do they add up?
By Kenneth S Kutska, CPSI
Executive Director
International Playground Safety Institute, LLC

The National Park and Recreation Association has successfully launched its online registry of CPSIs worldwide. In an effort to better serve us this registry lists all CPSIs who have opted to be listed as an inspector in good standing. The CPSI designation is good for three years from the date the participant passes their examination. Because the industry and its workforce is far from stagnant we have seen a lot of turnover in the NRPA registry over the years. Historically it appears there is at least a 30 to 40% annual attrition rate. While we have CPSI’s re-certifying for the 5th time we are seeing as many 50% first timers at nearly every location. We are pleased to finally see increased participation from school systems, childcare facilities and the military.

The economy has impacted the number of participants in many States but the annual number of institutes still exceeds 50. Since 2001 NRPA has conducted over 50 Institutes and certified or recertified more than 2,500 people. NRPA has maintained an up to date CPSI Registry of between 6,000 to 8,000.

Here are a few current statistics about the CPSI Certification Program. As of October 2009 there are currently only 606 people listed. This is voluntary and most seek CPSI designation for their agency only and chose not to be listed. Everyone will have a chance to be added to this registry in the near future. Keep an eye out for information via the NRPA Web site at www.nrpa.org. As of October 2009 there were:

• 7,033 CPSI note this number changes monthly as certifications expire and new people pass the examination
• 1,983 participants passed the CPSI examination out of more than 2,500.
• Total participants in CPSI Courses since 1991 is over 40,000
• The Examination Passing Score is now 70 out of 100.

Over the nearly twenty year history of the National Playground Safety Institute and the CPSI Course there have been significant fluctuations in the year to year participant totals. This information has not been analyzed to determine how or why these numbers fluctuate. I know from my long time involvement in this program that State legislative initiatives have significant impact on their State’s participation in the program. We have experienced up and downs in some State’s participation numbers when the NRPA Affiliate host organization experiences key staff turnover.

It is interesting to see how the CPSI numbers have changed over the years from State to State. In 1999 there was a total of 4,278 CPSI’s. The top states in totals were California at 492, North Carolina 284, Texas 245, New York 229 and both Washington and Florida 224. Ten years later things have changed. California and many other states have implemented legislation impacting public playgrounds. In a report dated October 12, 2009 there were 6,039 CPSIs. California still was leading the State by State total with 830 with Florida next at 353, Texas 327, Illinois 303 and Washington 291. You can see that many State’s numbers have more than doubled yet some like North Carolina and New York for some unknown reason have declined.

Back in the early 1990’s when I wrote my goals for the NPSI and CPSI Course I was hoping we would some day have one certified person in every community in America. While we are not there yet, I believe the numbers demonstrate that we are well on our way. If there has not been a CPSI Course held within your State for at least one year, I urge you to call the NRPA and volunteer to be the Local Host for your next CPSI Course in your area. Chances are your State Park and Recreation Affiliate organization is going through hard times and has cut back on staff who usually run these types or outreach programs and therefore they may need looking for someone to step in and organize the entire course. This is a big job but not as large as one might think. There is an excellent Local Host Manual with a step by step explanation of the entire process. Now is a good time to step forward. If you are from a school district, insurance agency, childcare facility, or military installation you too can help by assisting the local state park and recreation affiliate organization responsible for administering NRPA’s CPSI Courses. You can contact NRPA at www.nrpa.org and ask for your State’s affiliate phone number and contact person to help convince them to organize a CPSI Course near you. With your help we can make it happen.

What is ASTM and how does its work impact the playground industry?

Friday, January 29th, 2010

Overview of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
By Kenneth S Kutska, CPSI
Executive Director, International Playground Safety Institute, LLC
and ASTM F15.29 Subcommittee Chair for Public Playground Equipment

I, along with many other organizations and individuals, have come together over the past 20 plus years because of a common interest in developing performance requirements for various types of public play equipment that will help reduce life threatening and permanent debilitating injuries to children from 6 months to 12 years of age. The ASTM has provided the opportunity for various interests to work together in a consensus based process to create industry best practice standards for the public good. It is a very open organization and welcomes anyone to join in the process. Each member has an opportunity to be as involved in these standards development processes as they choose. I have taken the liberty to use much of the information provided on the ASTM Website, www.astm.org to provide this overview to the ASTM organization and how it effects all of us in the public playground industry. Let’s first look at the mission of the ASTM.

ASTM’s Mission Statement:
To be the foremost developer and provider of voluntary consensus standards, related technical information, and services having internationally recognized quality and applicability that

◆ promote public health and safety, and the overall quality of life;
◆ contribute to the reliability of materials, products, systems and services; and
◆ facilitate national, regional and international commerce.

ASTM International Headquarters
100 Barr Harbor Drive
West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959
USA
Phone: 610-832-9500
FAX: 610-832-9555
e-mail: service@astm.org
Web site: www.astm.org

Washington Office European Office
1828 L Street, NW 27-29 Knowl Piece
Suite 906 Wilbury Way
Washington, DC 20036 Hitchen, Herts SG4 OSX England
Phone: 202-835-0200 Phone: 1462 437933
FAX: 610-834-7089 FAX: 1462 433678
ASTM History
Providing the value, strength, and respect of marketplace consensus

In the late 19th century, failures in railroad equipment jeopardized public safety and posed the threat of bringing commerce to a standstill. Recognizing the need for a standardized method of testing the steel used to manufacture railroad components, a group of 20 engineers and professors met on June 16, 1898 and formed the American Section of the International Association for Testing Materials, the forerunner of ASTM International.

ASTM is one of the world’s largest standards developing organizations. An independent, not-for-profit organization, ASTM serves as a forum for producers, users, consumers, and those having a general interest (representatives of government and academia) to meet on common ground and develop voluntary, consensus standards. From the work of over 140 standards-writing technical committees, ASTM publishes standard test methods, specifications, practices, guides, classifications, and terminologies.

ASTM’s standards development activities encompass metals, paints, plastics, textiles, petroleum, construction, energy, the environment, consumer products, medical
services and devices, electronics, and many other areas. With more than 32,000 volunteer members representing 125 countries, ASTM publishes more than 11,500 standards each year in the 77 volumes of the Annual Book of ASTM Standards, CD-ROM, and on- line products. These standards and related information are distributed and used worldwide.

The Basic ASTM Organization Structure

The governing body of ASTM is the Board of Directors, whose members are elected by vote of the entire membership via ballot. The 22-member Board meets twice a year at ASTM Headquarters and in various international locations.

The Board has empowered special standing committees to perform important functions for the Society as a whole. The Committee on Technical Committee Operations (COTCO) develops and maintains the Regulations Governing ASTM Technical Committees and acts upon recommended changes to the Regulations. COTCO is responsible for the interpretation and enforcement of these regulations, jurisdictional disputes with respect to scopes of ASTM technical committees. COTCO develops and recommends means for achieving the most efficient operation of the technical committees as related to their scope, structure, development, and planning.

The Committee on Standards (COS) develops, maintains, and interprets the Form & Style for ASTM Standards and reviews all requests from technical committees for exceptions to this document. COS is responsible for the review and approval of all technical committee recommendations for actions on standards. COS verifies that the procedural requirements of the Society’s regulations and its criteria for due process have been satisfied. The Committee acts to resolve jurisdictional disputes with respect to standards.

The Committee on Publications (COP) advises the Board of Directors on the formulation of publications policy. COP is responsible for the publications program of the Society with the exception of acceptance criteria for the publication of ASTM standards. The Committee may, with the concurrence of the Board of Directors, initiate, continue, expand, or terminate periodicals, journals, series, or other continuing publications with the exception of the Annual Book of ASTM Standards. All standing committees report to the Board of Directors.

Within the formal structure of the Society, the technical committees exist as semiautonomous groups. The Board is responsible for approving the committees’ titles and scopes. Under the purview of the approved scope, the committees are organized into subcommittees and task groups. Each committee develops its own bylaws, which are subject to approval by COTCO. Committees elect their main committee officers in accordance with the nomination and election procedures outlined in the Regulations.
Committees conduct subcommittee and main committee/Society review ballots on standards actions and are subject to a procedural review by the Committee on Standards before final approval and publication by ASTM.

Technical subcommittees address specific subjects within the committee scope. Subcommittees may create sections and task groups. The executive subcommittee provides leadership and direction to the main committee. The composition of each executive committee is defined within the respective committee bylaws. Administrative subcommittees provide assistance to the technical subcommittees and may be established in areas such as editorial review of standards, terminology, government interface, international activities, strategic planning, symposia, awards, and liaison with other technical committees and outside organizations.

Membership in technical committees is open to all interested individuals and organizations. Within the technical committees, membership is classified by voting interest (company or organization) and must be balanced as defined within the ASTM Regulations. ASTM committees usually meet twice a year, either independently or at a committee week, in cities throughout the United States and abroad. Subcommittee and committee members are obliged to respond to ballots on standards actions. Each technical committee is assigned a staff manager who is responsible for the management functions and coordination of administrative services.

ASTM International is one of the largest voluntary standards development organizations in the world-a trusted source for technical standards for materials, products, systems, and services. Known for their high technical quality and market relevancy, ASTM International standards have an important role in the information infrastructure that guides design, manufacturing and trade in the global economy.
ASTM International, originally known as the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), was formed over a century ago and has continued to answer the call with consensus standards that have made products and services safer, better and more cost-effective. The proud tradition and forward vision that started in 1898 is still the hallmark of ASTM International.
Today, ASTM continues to play a leadership role in addressing the standardization needs of the global marketplace. Known for its best in class practices for standards development and delivery, ASTM is at the forefront in the use of innovative technology to help its members do standards development work, while also increasing the accessibility of ASTM International standards to the world.
ASTM continues to be the standards forum of choice of a diverse range of industries that come together under the ASTM umbrella to solve standardization challenges. In recent years, stakeholders involved in issues ranging from safety in recreational aviation, to fiber optic cable installations in underground utilities, to homeland security, have come together under ASTM to set consensus standards for their industries.
Standards developed at ASTM are the work of over 30,000 ASTM members. These technical experts represent producers, users, consumers, government and academia from over 120 countries. Participation in ASTM International is open to all with a material interest, anywhere in the world

ASTM Consumer Product Standards: Enhancing Product Quality and Buyer Safety
Quality and Buyer Safety
Each and every day, consumers around the world use various products with the confidence that they will work in a reliable and safe manner. ASTM International consumer product standards play a critical role in building trust between manufacturers and consumers about the performance of a wide variety of goods. By helping to improve product reliability, ASTM standards empower manufacturers to deliver high quality products and ultimately give consumers confidence that the products they purchase are safe and ready to use.

ASTM Product Safety Standards: Focus on Emerging Hazards

One of the most valuable contributions of ASTM consumer product safety standards is the manner in which they identify, address and mitigate emerging hazards in a multitude of products.

To this end, ASTM standards advocate for consumer safety, helping to reduce and eliminate potentially unsafe products before they are placed on store shelves and arrive in our homes.

Achieving this goal requires cooperation that goes beyond the responsibilities of an individual manufacturer. Safer products are ensured when all industry stakeholders work together: manufacturers, government regulators, trade and consumer groups, and individual consumers.

ASTM International has long been the consensus standards development forum that brings together diverse stakeholders with a shared interest in making consumer products as safe as possible. The open ASTM system allows all those concerned to engage directly in the standards development process and cooperate in achieving common goals. Through this openness and transparency, ASTM facilitates the development of standards that truly reflect the demands of the global marketplace. And while the use of ASTM standards is voluntary, government regulators have given them the force of law by citing them in legislation, regulations and codes, as evidenced in the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008, discussed later.

In the consumer field, ASTM standards address a wide range of areas, including toys, other infant and child products like cribs and playground equipment; household items like candles; cleaning-related tools such as vacuum cleaners, brooms and mops; sports equipment such as safety helmets; leisure activities like amusement rides; and many others. Several ASTM technical committees develop these standards, each of which contributes to enhancing product safety and building consumer confidence.

ASTM Committee F15: Setting Standards for Consumer Product Safety

ASTM International’s largest consumer product standards committee is F15 on Consumer Products, a group that has played an important role in consumer product safety standards for more than 35 years. The committee’s broad global membership of approximately 900 professionals includes stakeholders from the manufacturing and retail environment as well as representatives from government agencies and internationally respected trade and consumer groups. F15’s activities encompass 50 standards writing subcommittees, each of which focuses on a specific product area. F15 stakeholders work proactively in the public interest, forming new task groups on an ongoing basis to address urgent safety issues and newly identified hazards in various products.

ASTM F963: Ensuring Safer Toys

As new concerns about toys and other child-related safety issues have been raised during the last few years, the impact of ASTM International standards has again been brought to the forefront.

With thousands of new toys introduced in the marketplace each year, ASTM standards play a vital role in supporting children’s safety. An important contributor to that safety is ASTM F963, Consumer Safety Specification for Toy Safety, which establishes safety requirements for toys intended for use by children under the age of 14.

The value of ASTM F963 was underscored in 2008 when it became mandatory through the landmark U.S. Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act. As part of this new law, all toys sold in the United States must meet F963 safety requirements. ASTM F963, which is under the jurisdiction of Subcommittee F15.22 on Toy Safety, includes guidelines and test methods to prevent injuries from choking, sharp edges and other potential hazards. First drafted in 1971, the standard has been enhanced over the years to address new product technologies and innovations.

The latest F963 revision issued at the end of 2008 addresses a wide range of hazards such as magnet ingestion, jaw entrapment, acoustics issues, flammability testing, impaction and other critical areas.

Broad Scope of Child Safety Activities

Committee F15’s child safety standards activities also extend to issues such as pool-related drownings, strangulation by clothing drawstrings, bunk bed injuries, crayon toxicity and much more.

A particularly important set of standards addresses playground equipment for both public and home use, including issues such as head and neck entrapment, playground layout, accessibility, maintenance and labeling. These standards include ASTM F1487, Consumer Safety Performance Specification for Playground Equipment for Public Use, which covers equipment used by children from 2 to 12 years old; and F2373, Consumer Safety Performance Specification for Public Use Play Equipment for Children 6 Months through 23 Months, which provides a standard covering products intended for children 2 years old and younger. The residential play equipment industry is addressed by standard F1148, Consumer Safety Performance Specification for Home Playground Equipment. As of February 2009, all three of these standards were being revised to reflect the latest industry developments.

Safer Sports, Thanks to ASTM Committee F08

Whether aimed at serious professional athletes, or the millions of people who enjoy various recreational activities, the standards of ASTM Committee F08 on Sports Equipment and Facilities assist in making sports safer for all who participate. Formed in
1969, Committee F08 focuses on the development of standards, test methods and practices for sports equipment, surfaces and facilities to reduce the inherent risk of injuries. Committee F08 includes approximately 650 members who participate on one or more of 25 technical subcommittees that have responsibility for 130 standards. These standards cover a wide scope of sports areas, including headgear and helmets, bicycles, gymnastics and wrestling equipment, athletic footwear, eye safety, baseball and softball equipment, camping, fitness products, playing surfaces, playground impact attenuating surface systems and much more.

Committee F08 works closely with third-party certifiers that are in the business of certifying products meeting ASTM International or other standards. It is important for the certifying bodies to be involved in ASTM to understand the intent of the test methods and specifications so they can better implement testing practices in their facilities. In addition, many rules from the National Collegiate Athletic Association and the National Federation of State High School Associations rules reference F08 standards.

F08 Standards Improve Quality of Athletic Fields and Other Playing Surfaces

Another important topic of interest for the standards development activities of Committee F08 is athletic field improvement. Through the efforts of several of its subcommittees, F08 has contributed standards that have enhanced the quality of a variety of natural and artificial playing surfaces. Sports like baseball and football, which rely heavily on natural grass surfaces, are aided by such F08 standards as ASTM F2060, Guide for Maintaining Cool Season Turfgrasses on Athletic Fields. Sports stadiums and fields outfitted with artificial turf gain a valuable assist from the standards developed by Subcommittee F08.65 on Artificial Turf Surfaces and Systems. Notable standards include F1015, Test Method for Relative Abrasiveness of Synthetic Turf Playing Surfaces.

F08.65 is also addressing the issue of drainage failures, one of the major problems confronting owners and operators of synthetic turf sports fields. Committee members are currently working on a proposed new standard that provides a vertical permeability test of synthetic turf that will be useful to designers, testing agencies and contractors in minimizing problems associated with field drainage.

F08 athletic field and surface standards also extend outside the world of sports. One such guide provides an example of close connection among multiple ASTM consumer-related safety standards.

F1292, Specification for Impact Attenuation of Surfacing Materials within the Use Zone of Playground Equipment, covers performance requirements for playground surfaces and surfacing materials. F1292 references several other related ASTM playground safety standards, including F1487 and F1148 mentioned earlier. ASTM F1951 begins to address the accessibility of impact attenuating surfacing systems by measuring the energy required to navigate across the surface system as compared to going up a hard smooth ramped surface.

Safer Amusement Rides Thanks to Committee F24

ASTM Committee F24 on Amusement Rides and Devices is internationally recognized as the premier international authority on amusement ride standards. In 2008, F24 celebrated its 30th year of providing standards and guides that support and improve the strong safety record of the amusement ride industry.

F24’s membership includes a strong global representation, which enhances the acceptance of its standards by a broad range of international stakeholders, including the International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions, the Outdoor Amusement Business Association and the Amusement Industry Manufacturers and Suppliers International. To support the broad global interest and reach of the committee, all F24 standards are also made available in French and Spanish.

F24’s flagship standard is ASTM F2291, Practice for Design of Amusement Rides and Devices. Often referred to as the “world standard” for amusement ride design, F2291 details specific criteria for the design of rides and devices, and it was developed through the collaborative efforts of ride experts and interested parties from around the globe.

Recent notable activities of Committee F24 include the release of these standards: F2376, Practice for Classification, Design, Manufacture, Construction and Operation of Water Slide Systems; F2374, Practice for Design, Manufacture, Operation and Maintenance of Inflatable Amusement Devices; and F2007, Practice for Design, Manufacture and Operation of Concession Go-Karts and Facilities.

Whether it’s the countless products that support and enhance our daily lives, or the wide range of leisure and recreational activities we enjoy, consumers everywhere can continue to count on the safety and support provided by ASTM standards.

How are the principles upon which ASTM was founded relevant today?

From its inception, ASTM has emphasized the value and necessity of bringing together buyers and sellers to define issues and work cooperatively to improve product and material performance and overall quality of life. In 1898, the principles of openness, due process, balance of interests, and consensus established the basic foundation on which ASTM has matured and grown over its first 100 years. The ASTM member of 1998 relies on these same principles and the integrity of a proven process to produce standards of recognized technical excellence that have worldwide acceptance and use. We will continue to refine our process to achieve faster results in response to a significantly different social, political, and economic climate — but at the same time we will guard against compromising the principles on which we were founded.

In 2008, ASTM President, James A. Thomas, reflects on ASTM’s successful past and the Society’s next one hundred years
.
The next 100 years will offer new challenges. What will guide ASTM in the 21st century?

ASTM is a bottom-up organization that relies on and benefits from the guidance and leadership of its technical committee members. The ASTM system of standards development is flexible and dynamic and has demonstrated its ability to expand and change to meet constantly changing needs and expectations.

ASTM committees are a true reflection of the marketplace and are uniquely positioned to respond to the new technological and competitive challenges of a global economy.

How will advances in technology impact ASTM’s development and delivery of standards?

The pressure to properly use advances in technology to improve efficiency, timeliness, and cost effectiveness has never been greater on ASTM. We are responding by introducing new ways of conducting committee business between meetings by using the power of the World Wide Web. Our web-based Interactive Standards Development Forums will make it possible for members and other interested parties from around the world to contribute to the development of standards that will influence the future of their industries. Modifications of our balloting process, to remove redundancies and streamline administrative procedures through use of new technology, has significantly reduced the standards development cycle time in response to the demands of our constituency. Our efforts to accelerate the standards-development process without compromising our basic principles are constant and on-going.

Information delivery has evolved rapidly due to the impact of technological advances on both suppliers and users of all forms of data. ASTM’s challenge is to meet the needs of its members and customers for information delivery in multiple forms. The business climate and the demands of an evolving membership base make it imperative for ASTM to make the transition to improved electronic delivery as quickly as possible. We have already seen major advances in ASTM due to the positive application of new technology but we have much more to accomplish.

What effect has the new global economy had on ASTM?

From its beginning ASTM has been open to the direct participation of technical experts from around the world. ASTM was one of the first truly global systems for arriving at consensus on technical issues. The Society certainly benefited from the strength of the U.S. economy, which helped drive the application and use of many ASTM standards. However, the technological and economic center today is shared by the U.S. and other global partners. This change to a global economy fits the basic policy framework of ASTM. The ability of representatives from around the world to directly and materially influence the content of ASTM standards contributes to their continued acceptance on a worldwide basis. Our challenge is to find new ways to facilitate even greater direct participation of global stakeholders in our proven partnership.

As you consider ASTM’s second century, what is your vision for maintaining the Society’s pre-eminent position in standards development?

ASTM’s founders developed a formula for success that has proven itself repeatedly for 100 years. My job is to support, strengthen and reinforce a process that brings together technical experts representing industry, government, academia, and the general public to work cooperatively to promulgate standards that contribute to improved material and product performance and enhancements to the quality of life.

Our future is secure if we stay committed to the development of high-quality, technically credible standards.

The membership base of ASTM, supported by a competent and dedicated staff, is our greatest asset.

Relevant standardization projects accomplished in a timely, cost-effective manner is everyone’s goal. The opportunities facing ASTM are significant and will provide many challenges for the effective blending of technological and human resources. The times ahead certainly will be exciting.

ASTM Standards Impacting the Public Playground Industry

The following ASTM Standards and Standard Guides are found in Volume 15.07 for Sports Equipment and Facilities; Pedestrian/Walkway safety and Footwear; Amusement Rides and Devices; Snow Skiing
F355-01 Standard Test Method for Shock-Absorbing Properties of Playing Surface Systems and Materials: This test method covers the measurement of certain shock-absorbing characteristics, the impact force-time relationships, and the rebound properties of playing surface systems. This test method is applicable to natural and artificial playing surface systems and to components thereof. Typical playing surfaces are wrestling mats, football fields, soccer fields, playgrounds, and so forth.
F1292-04 Standard Specification for Impact Attenuation of Surfacing Materials within the Use Zone of Playground Equipment: This specification establishes minimum performance requirements for the impact attenuation of playground surfacing materials installed within the use zone of playground equipment. This specification is specific to surfacing used in conjunction with playground equipment, such as that described in Specifications F 1148, F 1487, F 1918, F 1951, and F 2075 and establishes an impact attenuation performance criterion for playground surfacing materials expressed as a critical fall height.
F1951-08 Standard Specification for Determination of Accessibility of Surface Systems Under and Around Playground Equipment: This specification establishes minimum characteristics for those factors that determine accessibility. This specification applies to all types of materials that can be used under and around playground equipment and must also comply with Specification F1292 if the surface is within the fall zone. This specification does not imply that an injury cannot be incurred if the surface system complies with this specification.
F2075-04e1 Standard Specification for Engineered Wood Fiber for Use as a Playground Safety Surface Under and Around Playground Equipment: This specification establishes minimum characteristics for those factors that determine particle size, consistency, purity, and ability to drain. Engineered wood fiber that meets the requirements of this specification must comply with Specification F 1292, if the surface is in the use zone as defined in Specification F 1487. A sample of wood fiber that meets the requirements of this specification may be designated engineered wood fiber and be suitable for playground safety surfacing but it does not imply that an injury cannot occur if the engineered wood fiber complies with this specification.
F2223-04e1 Standard Guide for ASTM Standards on Playground Surfacing: This guide covers standards for selecting and specifying surface systems under and around playground equipment. This guide describes how to apply existing ASTM standards to evaluate the impact attenuation, accessibility characteristics and product characteristics when selecting surfacing systems for use under and around playground equipment. This guide does not imply that an injury cannot occur when the surface system complies with standards referred to in this guide.
F2479-07 Standard Guide for Specification, Purchase, Installation and Maintenance of Poured-In-Place Playground Surfacing: This guide covers information with regard to the design, manufacture, installation, and maintenance of poured-in-place playground surfaces. This document is a guide and not intended to be used as a specification; it should be used for educational purposes. This guide outlines the issues of compliance with existing standards, durability, and functional longevity and reviews issues such as edge treatment, abutting surfaces, and combinations with other surfaces designed for circulation or protective surfaces. This guide presents maintenance considerations and general procedures that should be followed by the owner/operator. This guide outlines aging considerations such as loss of impact absorption, cracking, shrinkage, heaving, and how to prevent, accommodate, or rectify those issues. This guide presents warranty considerations and it does not imply that an injury cannot occur when the surface system is compliant with the standards referred to in this guide.
The Following Standards are found in Volume 15.11 for Consumer Products; Light Sports Aircraft; Unmanned Aircraft Systems; Normal and Utility Category Airplane Electrical System; Unmanned Undersea Vehicles (UUV) Systems
F1148-08 Standard Consumer Safety Performance Specification for Home Playground Equipment: This consumer safety specification provides safety requirements for various types of home playground equipment intended for use by children aged from over eighteen months through 10 years. It provides requirements for swings intended specifically for toddlers. Different age limits for various requirements are found in this specification which reflects the nature of the hazards and the expected mental or physical ability, or both, of the child to cope with the hazards.
F1487-07ae1 Standard Consumer Safety Performance Specification for Playground Equipment for Public Use: This consumer safety performance specification provides safety and performance standards for various types of public playground equipment. Its purpose is to reduce life-threatening and debilitating injuries. The range of users encompassed by this consumer safety performance specification is the 5th percentile 2-year-old through the 95th percentile 12-year-old. Home playground equipment, amusement rides, sports equipment, fitness equipment intended for users over the age of 12, public use play equipment intended for children 6 months to 24 months, and soft contained play equipment are not included in this specification. Products or materials (site furnishings) that are installed outside the equipment use zone, such as benches, tables, and borders used to contain protective surfacing are not considered playground equipment and are not included in this specification. The standard does not address accessibility. Except as it pertains to the safety issues not covered in the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG).
F1918-04 Standard Safety Performance Specification for Soft Contained Play Equipment: This safety performance specification provides safety and performance standards for soft contained play equipment. Its purpose is to reduce the potential for life-threatening and debilitating injuries. The range of users encompassed by this consumer safety performance specification is the 5th percentile 2-year-old through the 95th percentile 12-year-old. Public playground equipment, home playground equipment, amusement rides, sports equipment, fitness equipment intended for users over the age of 12, water-related attractions and devices, and toys and juvenile products are not included in this specification. The standard does not address accessibility. Except as it pertains to the safety issues not covered in the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG).
F2373-08 Standard Consumer Safety Performance Specification for Public Use Play Equipment for Children 6 Months through 23 Months: This consumer safety specification provides safety and performance requirements for various types of public use play equipment; such as, but not limited to, composite play structures, climbing equipment, and slides. It is intended to apply to play equipment that is used in places of public assembly, including early care and education facilities, parks, or playgrounds. Public use play areas for children in this age range include both indoor (classroom) settings and outdoor playgrounds. Where appropriate, distinctions will be made between indoor and outdoor settings where there is supervision (for example, a play area that is part of an early care and education facility), and settings with unlimited access (for example, public playgrounds and parks). The range of user is the 5th percentile 6 month old through the 95th percentile 23 month old. The purpose is to reduce the potential for life-threatening and debilitating injuries. Accessory toys attached to play equipment must meet all relevant standards including this consumer safety performance specification. Home playground equipment, amusement park equipment, sports equipment, fitness equipment, soft contained play equipment, tricycles, toys, juvenile care products such as, but not limited to, infant swings, play yards, expansion gates, and expandable enclosures, furniture (including child-sized house play furnishings and sand-water tables intended primarily for indoor use), bassinets and cradles, infant walkers, bouncer seats, jumpers, infant stationary activity centers, and infant carriers are not included in the scope of this specification.
Much of the content of this article comes from the ASTM Web site www.astm.org and their various standards documents. ASTM International Headquarters, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, USA, Phone: 610-832-9500